What We Are Reading
BLOG DISCUSSION
SEARCH
Navigation
About Graham Boyd

Graham Boyd is policy strategist and fund manager at Gemini Structured Carbon LTD. He has many years experience in investment research and fund management. During his spell in investment research has was highly rated a number of times in various published surveys of institutional investor opinions of the merits of investment research. The categories in which he was rated included investment strategy, economics, quantitative methods, and market timing. Various publications authored by him were also commended. He obtained Masters degrees at the Universities of Cambridge(UK) and South Africa, the latter with distinction. He has also studied portfolio management in Geneva. While an undergraduate he was awarded a certificate of merit as the top final year economics student, and also served as the campus publicity officer of the Wildlife Society. He has tutored and lectured in economics, business economics, and investment analysis to undergraduate and post-graduate students as well as to those taking professional exams, in various part-time capacities. Among his many interests outside of work he plays and studies classical and jazz guitar.  Prior to joining Gemini he worked as Deputy Director Industrial Economics in the Government Economic Service in Whitehall for several years. In this capacity he lead a team of economists and statisticians at BIS focusing on Energy and Climate Change. He was actively involved in the design and implementation of the various phases of the EU ETS (Emissions Trading Scheme).               

Members Login
Tuesday
Sep272011

What Spins our World: Of Wingnuts and Establishmentarians 

This week’s Barron’s (September 19, p45) has a Q&A with James Grant, that most erudite and astute of market commentators and investors, author of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer.  His definition of a bubble:  “A bubble is a bull market in which the user of the word ‘bubble’ has not fully participated”.  An observation he makes with which I concur is that much of the culpability for the present mess must be laid at least in part at the door of successive Chairmen of the Federal Reserve Board , for failing to distinguish between ordinary and desirable episodes of falling prices, and actual debt deflation, which they do need to combat.  He points out in the interview that “most Americans spend some part of the weekend hunting down everyday lower and lower prices”.  And with the expansion of the world economy in the digital age, “...wouldn’t you expect falling prices? That is called progress.  Deflation to me is trouble with debt, a symptom of which is falling prices.”

 In other words, debt deflation occurs when prices fall as a result of the distressed sale of assets in order to raise cash when debt servicing obligations become too onerous.  On an economy-wide scale it is indeed destabilising and needs to be counteracted by the central bank. When prices in general fall because of the increased participation of a new producer, say, China, on the global trading milieu and this results in lower prices for consumers, this is not harmful.  But if the central bank does not distinguish between the two, and seeks to combat each and every instance of falling prices in the cause of combating  “deflation” in a generalised sense, the result is lower economic welfare overall.

 Grant is also known for his still-extant long-run bullish view of gold.  But he also makes the point that we have discussed in our internal strategy meetings; that there can be no known true valuation for gold, that the gold price trades at whatever price the market determines on the day is the right price for gold.

  Also interesting in the context of the “On Current Stockmarket Volatility” note, Grant does not see the US as being in any way similar to Japan economically.  “Markets tend to clear. To the extent that we allow markets to clear we’ll be on our way”.        

Grant has just published a biography of a 19th century politician Thomas B. Reed entitled Mr Speaker!. He says about what he learned in writing the book that, “in Reed’s day, the final quarter of the 19th century, the wingnuts, the eccentrics, were those who argued for a paper currency uncollateralised by gold. Today, the eccentrics are the gold people. The establishmentarians are teaching at Princeton and running the central bank. I learned that cycles forever change and that wingnuts and establishmentarians change places, even before you know it. “

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
« What Spins our World: Schools of Thought | Main | What Spins our World: An appreciation for the franc zapper headline in the FT. »